AWS vs Azure
Both clouds will host your app just fine. The real question is which one fits your team, your existing contracts, and the people you can hire.
Get a free quoteAWS and Azure run most of the internet between them, and either one will serve your product well. That's the boring truth nobody selling you a migration wants to say. AWS is the bigger platform with the deeper service catalog; Azure is the natural pick for companies already living inside Microsoft's world.
We deploy client backends to both from India — mostly AWS, some Azure — so this isn't theory. Below is what actually differs for a typical product team, and the situations where we'd argue for one over the other.
AWS still leads the market and offers the widest spread of managed services — EC2, Lambda, S3, RDS, DynamoDB and a couple hundred more. Whatever odd thing you need, there's usually a managed version of it.
More engineers know AWS than any other cloud. Docs, courses, and answered questions exist for nearly every failure mode you'll ever hit at 2 a.m.
Amplify, App Runner, and Lightsail let a small team ship without a dedicated DevOps hire, and AWS Activate credits soften the first year's bill considerably.
Mumbai and Hyderabad for Indian users, Sydney for Australia, plenty of US regions. Latency is almost never the deciding problem.
If your company runs on Entra ID, Microsoft 365, and .NET, Azure slots in with far less friction — single sign-on, existing admin skills, familiar support channels.
Existing Microsoft agreements often carry discounts and committed spend that make Azure meaningfully cheaper than its list price. For many enterprises, that alone settles it.
App Service, Azure SQL, and AKS are excellent. Deploying a .NET or Node API to App Service is about as low-drama as hosting gets.
GPT models inside your own tenant, with enterprise data terms and regional hosting. For regulated clients adding AI features, that's a real and specific draw.
For comparable compute and storage, list prices land close enough that it rarely decides anything. What moves the bill is architecture — serverless versus always-on servers, egress, managed database sizing — plus committed-use discounts. Azure wins on price mainly for orgs with existing Microsoft agreements.
Azure's portal is friendlier on day one; AWS has more third-party learning material for month six. Honestly, both sprawl. A team that knows one cloud well can pick up the other in a few weeks of real project work.
Usually AWS. It's our default stack, the hiring pool is deeper, and startup credits help early on. We'd steer you to Azure if your product is .NET-centric or your buyers are enterprises that already trust Microsoft paper.
Yes — that's the normal arrangement. Our dedicated teams handle deployment, monitoring, and cost reviews from India at rates starting around USD 20/hr, with overlap hours matched to US and Australian time zones.
A solid third option with strong data and ML tooling, and it pairs nicely with Firebase. Its enterprise footprint is smaller, so hiring and third-party integrations take a bit more effort. We're happy to talk through it if GCP is on your shortlist.
“GTSInfosoft and team are amazing! They have done so much to improve our systems and are still doing much work for us :) Thank you!.”
Send us your stack and your constraints — we'll tell you which cloud we'd deploy to and roughly what it'll cost to run.
Get a free quote